A man is a rape-supporter if…
*.He has ever sexually engaged with any woman while she was underage, drunk, high, physically restrained, unconscious, or subjected to psychological, physical, economic, or emotional coercion.
*.He has blamed a woman for “putting herself in a situation” where she “could be” attacked.
*.He threatens to patronise prostitutes when patner says no to his sex appeal defends .
Defends men accused for rape in court even with glaring evidence
*.He watches pornography in which women are depicted.
*.He watches any pornography in which sexual acts are depicted as a struggle for power or domination, regardless of whether women are present.
*.He characterizes the self-sexualizing behavior of some women, such as wearing make-up or high heels, as evidence of women’s desire to “get” a man.
*.He tells or laughs at jokes involving women being attacked, sexually “hoodwinked,” or sexually harassed.
*.He expresses enjoyment of movies/musicals/TV shows/plays in which women are sexually demeaned or presented as sexual objects
*.He mocks women who complain about sexual attacks, sexual harassment, street cat-calls, media depictions of women, or other forms of sexual objectification.
For every penny he gives you, he indirectly expects girl to pay back in kind
*.He states or implies that women who do not want to have sex with men are “inhibited,” “prudes,” “stuck-up,” “man-haters,” or psychologically ill.
*.He argues that certain male behaviors towards women are “cultural” and therefore not legitimate subjects of feminist attention.
*.He ever subordinates the interests of women in a given population to the interests of the men in that population, or proceeds in discussions as if the interests of the women are the same as the interests of the men.
*.He promotes religious or philosophical views in which a woman’s physical/psychological/emotional/sexual well-being is subordinated to a man’s.
*.He describes female anatomy in terms of penetration, or uses terms referencing the supposed “emptiness” of female anatomy when describing women.e.g calling girls holes.
*.He defends the sexualization or sexual abuse of minor females on the grounds of “consent” or “willingness.”
*.He promotes the idea that women as a class are happier or more fulfilled if they have man, or that they “should” have man.
*.He argues that people (or just “men”) have sexual “needs.”
*.He discusses the “types” of women he finds sexually appealing and/or attempts to demean women by telling them he does not find them sexually appealing.
*.He defends these actions by saying that some women also engage in rape.
Are you guilty of any of these?